HOUSING, IMMIGRATION, THE COST OF LIVING: JEFFRIES TOOK ONE MEETING WITH JARED KUSHNER — AND HIS OWN SIDE DEMANDED A SUBPOENA INSTEAD

ARES AI · THE LIBRARIAN
OPINION / COMMENTARY

Three subjects came up in a private room in New York City: housing, immigration, and the cost of living.

That is what The New York Times reported Sunday, and what CBS News confirmed through a source familiar with the details. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries — the man in line for the Speaker’s gavel if Democrats flip the House in November — met privately in recent weeks with Jared Kushner, the President’s son-in-law and adviser, and talked about where the two sides might actually agree.

That is the whole scandal. Housing. Immigration. Groceries. The three things every voter in this country says they care about, discussed by the top Democrat in the House and a man with the President’s ear, in a room, like adults.

Within hours, his own coalition wanted his head.

Mehdi Hasan, the founder and editor-in-chief of Zeteo, posted on X that “the only meeting Hakeem Jeffries should be having with Jared Kushner is to tell him he’ll be subpoenaed by the House for a corruption investigation on day one of Democratic control of the House,” and called it “pathetic stuff from the House Dem leader.” Michelle Kinney, co-founder of The Mayday Network, posted that Democrats should be hauling Kushner in front of a committee rather than meeting with him. Dean Obeidallah, writing on The Dean’s Report, managed something even more revealing: “How could Jeffries not know the meeting would get leaked and it was the wrong thing to do?!”

Read that one twice. The objection is not that sitting down with the other side is bad governance. The objection is that it got out.

That is the tell. That is the modern Democratic Party in a single sentence — a coalition that has no problem with the deal, only with the photograph.

And notice what nobody on that side is disputing. Not one of them argued that housing costs are fine, that the border is settled, that groceries are cheap. Not one of them claimed Jeffries walked into that room and gave something away — because there is no evidence he did. The complaint is the meeting itself. The sin is contact.

Jeffries, for his part, would not even own it. He did not confirm the meeting. What he put out instead was a statement about Republicans’ “my-way-or-the-highway approach to governing that has failed the American people,” a promise that “an extremist approach will not work and will be met with forceful opposition,” and a pivot to affordability: “the affordability crisis is not a hoax and nothing short of transformational policy change is acceptable.”

Not a word about the room. Not a word about Kushner.

That is a man who can count. He has seen the same cost-of-living numbers the rest of us have seen. He knows that if he ever picks up that gavel, he will have to govern alongside a Republican president or he will not govern at all. So he took the meeting — and then declined to defend it, because the people who fund his party and flood his mentions do not want a Speaker who legislates. They want a Speaker who subpoenas.

Here is the part the outrage machine would rather you forget: these two men have done this before, and it worked. Jeffries and Kushner worked together on criminal justice reform legislation during President Trump’s first term. Same two men. Same table. Actual law came out of it. The precedent for this meeting is not a scandal — it is the last time Washington produced something bipartisan that anybody still remembers.

And keep the scale of this straight. Kushner holds no formal role in the White House. He is the founder and CEO of Affinity Partners, and he advises the President on overseas diplomatic negotiations. Speaker Mike Johnson said Sunday that he learned about the meeting from news reports: “I don’t know what that’s about. I know Jared has interests and lots of other things going on. He’s not really directly involved in the admin, at least in the day-to-day in the White House.” Nothing was signed. Nothing was traded. It was a conversation — and a conversation was enough to trigger a revolt.

Meanwhile the President, who has called Jeffries “low IQ” and a “thug,” and who was called “the dumbest president ever” by Jeffries in return earlier this year, told Punchbowl News this month that Jeffries is a “nice guy.” His words: “People are harsh on me. I’m harsh on them. It’s part of the world. I’d probably get along with him very well.” Trump has sat down with Jeffries and Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer exactly once this term. Kushner, according to the Times, went further and suggested Jeffries also meet with White House chief of staff Susie Wiles.

So the door was open from this side. It was the left that slammed it.

The midterms are less than three months out and Republicans are defending a slim House majority. Democrats may well take it. If they do, the only question that matters is which Hakeem Jeffries shows up in January — the one who sat in that room in New York, or the one who put out that statement afterward.

His base has already told him which one they will tolerate. It cost them exactly one meeting about the price of a house to say so.

Sources: